ICICI Life Insurance's profit up 25% at ₹374 cr on higher premium income
ICICI Life Insurance moved higher in a quarterly results development for Q2FY27.
· BS Companies, ET Stocks, Economic Times Markets
The insurer's net premium income rose 16.56 per cent to Rs 13,804 crore in Q2FY27, while value of new business grew 20.3 per cent to Rs 712 crore, with margins…
Key facts
- Period
- Q2FY27
The analysis
ICICI Life Insurance reported ₹374 cr, Rs 13,804 crore and Rs 712 crore for Q2FY27, with movement of 25%, 20.3% and 16.56% attached to those lines. Those are the figures as filed — what moves the price is how they sit against what the market already expected, not their absolute size.
Against that, the stock is -0.5% on the day at ₹410.00. It sits 9% below its 52-week high.
For ICICI Life Insurance, the question is how much of this is already reflected in the price and how much re-rates the insurance peer set alongside it.
Why it matters
- Earnings versus expectations is what actually re-rates a stock; the surprise matters more than the absolute number.
Market context
- In focus: ICICI Life Insurance (ICICILIFE), in Insurance.
- ICICI Life Insurance: 52-week and period figures are measured since it listed on 14 Oct 2026.
| Company | Price | Day | 1M | 3M | From 52-wk high | Volume vs 20-day | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Life InsuranceICICILIFE · Insurance · Listed 14 Oct 2026 | ₹410.00 | -0.5% | — | — | -8.7% | — | — |
Insurance
1M -5.4% · 3M -13.4%
ICICI Life Insurance
Prices as of 30 Oct 2026, 16:10 IST. Sector moves are the average of the stocks we track in each sector.
In this story
Related coverage
US debt ceiling crisis in 2027? Why Indian markets should watch the November midterm elections
LIC Housing Fin Q2 net profit grows 12% YoY
New India slips into red with 1,267 cr loss in Q2
F&O Talk: Big break above 23,200 can open doors for 23,500 for Nifty; Sudeep Shah picks 6 stocks ahead of Diwali
ET Wealth Expo: Why market veteran S Naren thinks investors are getting gold, silver and asset allocation all wrong